Matthew 14:13- 21

Even as consensus emerged on many fronts, inherent divergences also remained in the listening process. With clericalism and co-responsibility, tensions arose in practice.

Participants observed that ‘while many clergy spoke positively about co responsibility, others expressed reservations or concerns, leading to little practical change in some parishes.' Lay participants saw ‘shared leadership as essential for the Church's future' but felt that ‘clergy must be willing to share responsibility, and the laity must be prepared to accept responsibility' for it to become a reality.

For faith formation and education, differences arose regarding the role of schools vis-à-vis parishes and families. Some suggested ‘removing sacramental preparation from schools entirely so that parents and parishes take full responsibility,' while others preferred ‘a shared approach between school, parish, and home.' These reflected generational and philosophical divides, with some favouring ‘experiential and relational faith formation' and others emphasising ‘a structured, doctrinal approach to teaching the faith.'

Divergence with liturgy emerged around style, language, and relevance. Some advocated for change, calling for ‘more inclusive language, participation, and a sense of belonging through worship,' while others cautioned against altering established forms, warning that ‘rigidity is not helpful, but neither is change for its own sake.' Visions differed between adaptability to connect with modern life and emphasising stability and tradition.